Skip to main content

Wheat from Ukraine: Looting as a policy


by Martin Aslan


In a country suffering from war, all exports are restricted in order to cover the needs of the population. In Ukraine, shortages of wheat and gas have been identified. Therefore, it is crucial to control the flows of such goods in order to protect the population. 

It seems that the authorities are not able to completely restrict exports. On May 24 reports from the Luhasnk Oblast indicated that people in the town of Stanytsia Luhanska have complained about the lack of fuel at gas stations and about Russian substandard food.

It appears that Russia is taking advantage of the situation by organizing the export of the goods urgently needed by civilians. This could be regarded as starvation as a method of warfare. Using starvation of civilians as a method of combat is prohibited by the Geneva Convention (1977 additional protocols) as well as by the Russian Federation’s Military Manual.

Grain is first moved to the ports of Crimea (Kerch, Sevastopol, Feodosia), occupied by Russia. There, the grains are loaded on dry cargo ships. Based on the size and number of ships departing from Crimea, it seems the quantity exported is very important. On May 21 alone, 2 large ships have departed from Crimea. On May 23 an additional vessel left Crimea.

The destination of many vessels is Syria. This could mean that Russia is trying to support its Syrian ally and guarantee stability there, to the detriment of the Ukrainian population.

Below, you can see the pictures of the vessels exporting wheat out of Ukraine. I received these pictures from a personal contact located in Ukraine. I will try to get more first-hand information on what is happening there in the near future and offer analysis for my readers.

The dry cargo ship “Mikhail Nenashev”, departed on May 21. The vessel returns to Sevastopol after the delivery of grain to a Syrian port.


The dry cargo “Souria” left on May 21. The vessel makes a return voyage to the port of Feodosia after delivery to the port of Iskanderun (Turkiye).


The dry cargo ship “Matros Pozynich” departed on May 23 and headed for Syria to deliver grain there.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Türkish influence in Asia: promoter of peace or supplier of weapons?

by Martin Aslan Türkiye’s relationship with Asia is a dynamic blend of cultural, religious, and economic ties shaping Türkiye’s foreign policy and regional influence. These multifaceted connections reveal how cultural and religious bonds intersect with Türkiye’s paradoxical roles as both a peacemaker and arms supplier and raises questions about its real commitment in fighting fitna (division) within the Muslim world. This ambiguous position also raises questions about the effectiveness of Ankara’s influence. Cultural and religious connections Asia has long held historical and cultural importance for Türkiye. The Turkish people originally migrated from regions around present-day Mongolia, a heritage President Erdogan often recalls. This historical memory partly explains Türkiye’s continuing interest in the Uyghur people of China. While Ankara occasionally criticizes Beijing’s repression of Uyghurs, it offers little tangible support. Türkiye’s cultural resonance extends to South Asia, pa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkish concerns mount as Iranian Kurdish Coalition rises

by Martin Aslan Both Erdoğan’s government and the Iranian regime perceive the Kurds as a threat. Estimates place their population between 7 and 15 million in Iran, Iranian Kurds—known as Rojhelati or Eastern Kurds—have faced ongoing discrimination, including restrictions on Kurdish language education, cultural expression, and political organizing. On February 22, 2026, five major Iranian Kurdish opposition parties formed the Coalition of Political Forces of Iranian Kurdistan (CPFIK) to coordinate efforts against the Islamic Republic. A sixth group, the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, joined on March 4. The coalition includes: Such political coordination among Iranian Kurdish movements is likely to be closely watched in Ankara, where Kurdish political and territorial developments beyond Türkiye’s borders are viewed through a national security lens. If Iranian Kurdish parties were to gain territorial control in Iranian Kurdistan, it would likely heighten concerns in Ankara. Türkiye ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkey's Cynical Game: Fueling Middle East Chaos While Preaching Peace

by Martin Aslan In the volatile geopolitics of March 2026, Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan remains the region's most destabilizing force—master of loud moral outrage and quiet strategic opportunism. The Azerbaijan-Israel axis perfectly exposes Ankara's hypocrisy. Azerbaijan supplies Israel with roughly 46% of its crude oil imports, flowing through Turkey's Ceyhan port via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. In return, Israeli drones and advanced weaponry helped Baku decisively defeat Armenia in recent conflicts. This partnership directly counters Iran, providing Israel intelligence access near Tehran's borders and stoking fears of unrest among Iran's large ethnic Azeri population. Turkey vociferously backs Azerbaijan as “one nation, two states,” supplying political cover and military aid. Simultaneously, Erdoğan unleashes blistering anti-Israel rhetoric—especially over Gaza—imposing partial trade bans to rally domestic and Islamic support. Yet reality betrays the bl...
Post a Comment
Read more