Skip to main content

Why is Russia targeting civilian infrastructure in Ukraine?

by Martin Aslan


Since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, there have been numerous reports of civilian casualties. Russian media often describe these incidents as collateral damage. Indeed, it is possible for mistakes to occur during military operations, resulting in civilian deaths.

However, evidence suggests that harm to civilians occurs on a regular basis, with destruction focused on infrastructure that holds strategic value. Additionally, infrastructure with significant psychological importance is frequently targeted. This indicates that the Russian forces are deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure.

What Kind of Infrastructure Is Being Targeted?

All essential infrastructure has sustained damage from Russian forces in recent months. This includes water, electricity, gas, and food supplies.

For example:

  • May 24: Missile strikes and artillery shelling were carried out in the Zaporizhia Oblast, destroying electricity pylons that 22,000 people relied on. Russian forces also damaged the gas pipeline supplying gas to 100,000 people in the Luhansk and Zaporizhia Oblasts.
  • May 28: Strikes in the Zaporizhia Oblast caused further damage to power lines, leaving more than 2,700 people without electricity in the Polohy and Orihiv regions. Gas transmission systems in Vasylivka, Hulyaypole, and Orihiv settlements were damaged, while the Stepnohirsk water system was also affected. On the same day, a local firefighting department and agricultural facilities were destroyed.

The images below show that the targeted infrastructure was clearly civilian in nature.

Damages on May 24 in the Avdiivka town




Damages on May 28 in the Mykolaiv town



In another article, I analyzed the looting in Ukraine and Russia’s illegal export of Ukrainian wheat to starve the population. This strategy is aimed at destabilizing the country and supporting its allies, such as Syria.

Destabilization can also be achieved by attacking psychologically significant targets. Schools, for instance, are particularly sensitive. By making parents fear for their children’s safety, an invading force can weaken their resolve to fight for their country. This policy of targeting children is so extensive and calculated that I will dedicate a separate article to this issue.



A preschool damaged on May 24


Why Is This Happening?

By attacking civilians, Russia is sending a clear message of determination. The implicit message is that it does not respect international rules, such as the Geneva Conventions, to which it is a party. These conventions prohibit attacks on civilian objects.

Through these actions, Russia demonstrates that it is willing to harm the population and escalate further if there is resistance. The aim is to convince people that surrendering is preferable to continued fighting, which would only lead to greater suffering.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Türkish influence in Asia: promoter of peace or supplier of weapons?

by Martin Aslan Türkiye’s relationship with Asia is a dynamic blend of cultural, religious, and economic ties shaping Türkiye’s foreign policy and regional influence. These multifaceted connections reveal how cultural and religious bonds intersect with Türkiye’s paradoxical roles as both a peacemaker and arms supplier and raises questions about its real commitment in fighting fitna (division) within the Muslim world. This ambiguous position also raises questions about the effectiveness of Ankara’s influence. Cultural and religious connections Asia has long held historical and cultural importance for Türkiye. The Turkish people originally migrated from regions around present-day Mongolia, a heritage President Erdogan often recalls. This historical memory partly explains Türkiye’s continuing interest in the Uyghur people of China. While Ankara occasionally criticizes Beijing’s repression of Uyghurs, it offers little tangible support. Türkiye’s cultural resonance extends to South Asia, pa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkish concerns mount as Iranian Kurdish Coalition rises

by Martin Aslan Both Erdoğan’s government and the Iranian regime perceive the Kurds as a threat. Estimates place their population between 7 and 15 million in Iran, Iranian Kurds—known as Rojhelati or Eastern Kurds—have faced ongoing discrimination, including restrictions on Kurdish language education, cultural expression, and political organizing. On February 22, 2026, five major Iranian Kurdish opposition parties formed the Coalition of Political Forces of Iranian Kurdistan (CPFIK) to coordinate efforts against the Islamic Republic. A sixth group, the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, joined on March 4. The coalition includes: Such political coordination among Iranian Kurdish movements is likely to be closely watched in Ankara, where Kurdish political and territorial developments beyond Türkiye’s borders are viewed through a national security lens. If Iranian Kurdish parties were to gain territorial control in Iranian Kurdistan, it would likely heighten concerns in Ankara. Türkiye ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkey's Cynical Game: Fueling Middle East Chaos While Preaching Peace

by Martin Aslan In the volatile geopolitics of March 2026, Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan remains the region's most destabilizing force—master of loud moral outrage and quiet strategic opportunism. The Azerbaijan-Israel axis perfectly exposes Ankara's hypocrisy. Azerbaijan supplies Israel with roughly 46% of its crude oil imports, flowing through Turkey's Ceyhan port via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. In return, Israeli drones and advanced weaponry helped Baku decisively defeat Armenia in recent conflicts. This partnership directly counters Iran, providing Israel intelligence access near Tehran's borders and stoking fears of unrest among Iran's large ethnic Azeri population. Turkey vociferously backs Azerbaijan as “one nation, two states,” supplying political cover and military aid. Simultaneously, Erdoğan unleashes blistering anti-Israel rhetoric—especially over Gaza—imposing partial trade bans to rally domestic and Islamic support. Yet reality betrays the bl...
Post a Comment
Read more