Skip to main content

The Reasons for Turkish Intervention in Syria


by Martin Aslan


A new attack in Türkiye has triggered a fourth Turkish military intervention in Syria. The consequences of this new Turkish military operation could further deteriorate the social and security situation in the region. Syria is gradually losing control of its sovereignty to third countries such as Russia and Türkiye.

On 13 November, another attack hit Istanbul on the busy Istiklal Avenue. This cowardly act left six people dead and 81 injured. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan immediately promised that those responsible for this vile attack would be unmasked and punished. A few hours later, one person was arrested. Although the presumed perpetrator of this attack was of Syrian nationality, the Turkish authorities were quick to accuse the PYD1 and the PKK. The day after the attack, 46 people were arrested. This event comes at a time when Türkiye is doing everything it can to launch a new military operation in northern Syria against Kurdish groups affiliated with the PYD. Indeed, the attack is seen by some as a pretext for launching Operation Claw-Sword on 20 November 2022.

This fourth operation will have dramatic consequences for the future of Syria and the Syrian people. Bombardments hit the Al-Hol camp held by the FDS2, grain silos near Al-Malikiyah, and a power station. Combined with the policy of draining the Euphrates, the situation is a social and security time bomb for Syria. While the targets Türkiye is dealing with run counter to the Geneva Conventions, these actions are all the more unacceptable as they interfere with the fight against al-Qaeda and Islamic State terrorist groups. Moreover, like the Turkish interventions in northern Iraq, these actions violate Syria's territorial sovereignty.

The Turkish intervention is undoubtedly supported by Iran, which has launched a similar operation in northern Iraq against Iranian Kurdish groups. Negotiations are also underway with Russia, which nevertheless wants the Turkish military operation to be limited. Türkiye’s desire to create a 30 km corridor3 along the Syrian-Turkish border is one of President Erdoğan's priorities. This buffer zone is the result of an agreement signed in 2019 between Ankara and Moscow. By allowing Türkiye to intervene in Syria, Russia and Iran appear to be managing matters of sovereignty instead of the Syrian state. Under Russian pressure, Bashar al-Assad and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan may eventually find common ground, and Damascus and Ankara may once again become partners4 to put an end to the Kurdish presence.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 Kurdish group considered by Turkiye to be an offshoot of the PKK in Syria.

2 Syrian Democratic Focrces

3 On Syrian territory

4 Before the start of the conflict in 2011, Damascus and Ankara were political and economic partners.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relations between Türkiye and Latin America

by Martin Aslan Türkiye has established a real presence in regions such as Africa, especially in Libya and Somalia, as well as in Central Asia. Yet, one part of the world remains relatively under the radar in Turkish foreign policy: Latin America. Despite the geographical distance, it seems Ankara has been quietly working to expand its defense footprint in the region. Interestingly, the roots of Türkiye’s connection to Latin America stretch back to the 19th century, when immigrants from the Ottoman Empire, mostly Arabs, settled in South America. Locals called them "Los Turcos" (The Turks), a nickname that still stucks despite their actual ethnic origins. High-level visits and diplomatic expansion Türkiye launched an “Action Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean” in 1998. It was revised in 2006, when Türkiye declared that year as the “Year of Latin America and the Caribbean”. The plan served as a formal roadmap for engaging more seriously in the region. The first Turkish pr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Beyond Diplomacy: Türkiye’s Economic Footprint in Africa

by Martin Aslan Over the past two decades, Türkiye has undergone a significant transformation in its foreign policy, with the African continent emerging as a key strategic focus. Driven by a mix of economic ambition, diplomatic outreach, and geopolitical recalibration, Türkiye has steadily expanded its presence across Africa. This shift, which accelerated after Reçep Tayyip Erdoğan came to power in 2003, is reflected in the rapid increase in Turkish embassies, investment flows, and trade partnerships on the continent. While officials emphasize a “win-win” model of cooperation, critics argue that Türkiye’s engagement is guided more by resource acquisition and market access than by mutual development goals. Let’s not forget that Africa is a continent rich in natural resources, while Türkiye has very few (see the article “Africa, a continent with growing appeal”: https://turkishpulse.blogspot.com/2023/10/africa-continent-with-growing-appeal.html). This article examines the development of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Central Asia’s Cyprus Shift: Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan Defy Türkiye’s Stance

By Derya Vogel Why would Central Asian nations—key members of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS)—publicly challenge a Turkish-backed entity in the Mediterranean? At the EU–Central Asia Summit in Samarkand on April 3–4, 2025, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan made a surprising move: they endorsed UN Security Council Resolutions 541 and 550, which reject the legitimacy of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), a breakaway state recognized only by Türkiye. These resolutions reaffirm the Republic of Cyprus as the island’s sole legal government and call on all UN members not to recognize the TRNC or support its consolidation. To understand this shift, we must look back to 1974, when Cyprus was divided following a coup by Greek Cypriot nationalists aiming for unification with Greece. Türkiye responded by intervening militarily, leading to the island’s partition. The TRNC declared independence in 1983, but has remained diplomatically isolated. Türkiye, however, has consis...
Post a Comment
Read more