Skip to main content

The Reasons for Turkish Intervention in Syria


by Martin Aslan


A new attack in Türkiye has triggered a fourth Turkish military intervention in Syria. The consequences of this new Turkish military operation could further deteriorate the social and security situation in the region. Syria is gradually losing control of its sovereignty to third countries such as Russia and Türkiye.

On 13 November, another attack hit Istanbul on the busy Istiklal Avenue. This cowardly act left six people dead and 81 injured. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan immediately promised that those responsible for this vile attack would be unmasked and punished. A few hours later, one person was arrested. Although the presumed perpetrator of this attack was of Syrian nationality, the Turkish authorities were quick to accuse the PYD1 and the PKK. The day after the attack, 46 people were arrested. This event comes at a time when Türkiye is doing everything it can to launch a new military operation in northern Syria against Kurdish groups affiliated with the PYD. Indeed, the attack is seen by some as a pretext for launching Operation Claw-Sword on 20 November 2022.

This fourth operation will have dramatic consequences for the future of Syria and the Syrian people. Bombardments hit the Al-Hol camp held by the FDS2, grain silos near Al-Malikiyah, and a power station. Combined with the policy of draining the Euphrates, the situation is a social and security time bomb for Syria. While the targets Türkiye is dealing with run counter to the Geneva Conventions, these actions are all the more unacceptable as they interfere with the fight against al-Qaeda and Islamic State terrorist groups. Moreover, like the Turkish interventions in northern Iraq, these actions violate Syria's territorial sovereignty.

The Turkish intervention is undoubtedly supported by Iran, which has launched a similar operation in northern Iraq against Iranian Kurdish groups. Negotiations are also underway with Russia, which nevertheless wants the Turkish military operation to be limited. Türkiye’s desire to create a 30 km corridor3 along the Syrian-Turkish border is one of President Erdoğan's priorities. This buffer zone is the result of an agreement signed in 2019 between Ankara and Moscow. By allowing Türkiye to intervene in Syria, Russia and Iran appear to be managing matters of sovereignty instead of the Syrian state. Under Russian pressure, Bashar al-Assad and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan may eventually find common ground, and Damascus and Ankara may once again become partners4 to put an end to the Kurdish presence.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 Kurdish group considered by Turkiye to be an offshoot of the PKK in Syria.

2 Syrian Democratic Focrces

3 On Syrian territory

4 Before the start of the conflict in 2011, Damascus and Ankara were political and economic partners.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Türkish influence in Asia: promoter of peace or supplier of weapons?

by Martin Aslan Türkiye’s relationship with Asia is a dynamic blend of cultural, religious, and economic ties shaping Türkiye’s foreign policy and regional influence. These multifaceted connections reveal how cultural and religious bonds intersect with Türkiye’s paradoxical roles as both a peacemaker and arms supplier and raises questions about its real commitment in fighting fitna (division) within the Muslim world. This ambiguous position also raises questions about the effectiveness of Ankara’s influence. Cultural and religious connections Asia has long held historical and cultural importance for Türkiye. The Turkish people originally migrated from regions around present-day Mongolia, a heritage President Erdogan often recalls. This historical memory partly explains Türkiye’s continuing interest in the Uyghur people of China. While Ankara occasionally criticizes Beijing’s repression of Uyghurs, it offers little tangible support. Türkiye’s cultural resonance extends to South Asia, pa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkish concerns mount as Iranian Kurdish Coalition rises

by Martin Aslan Both Erdoğan’s government and the Iranian regime perceive the Kurds as a threat. Estimates place their population between 7 and 15 million in Iran, Iranian Kurds—known as Rojhelati or Eastern Kurds—have faced ongoing discrimination, including restrictions on Kurdish language education, cultural expression, and political organizing. On February 22, 2026, five major Iranian Kurdish opposition parties formed the Coalition of Political Forces of Iranian Kurdistan (CPFIK) to coordinate efforts against the Islamic Republic. A sixth group, the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, joined on March 4. The coalition includes: Such political coordination among Iranian Kurdish movements is likely to be closely watched in Ankara, where Kurdish political and territorial developments beyond Türkiye’s borders are viewed through a national security lens. If Iranian Kurdish parties were to gain territorial control in Iranian Kurdistan, it would likely heighten concerns in Ankara. Türkiye ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkey's Cynical Game: Fueling Middle East Chaos While Preaching Peace

by Martin Aslan In the volatile geopolitics of March 2026, Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan remains the region's most destabilizing force—master of loud moral outrage and quiet strategic opportunism. The Azerbaijan-Israel axis perfectly exposes Ankara's hypocrisy. Azerbaijan supplies Israel with roughly 46% of its crude oil imports, flowing through Turkey's Ceyhan port via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. In return, Israeli drones and advanced weaponry helped Baku decisively defeat Armenia in recent conflicts. This partnership directly counters Iran, providing Israel intelligence access near Tehran's borders and stoking fears of unrest among Iran's large ethnic Azeri population. Turkey vociferously backs Azerbaijan as “one nation, two states,” supplying political cover and military aid. Simultaneously, Erdoğan unleashes blistering anti-Israel rhetoric—especially over Gaza—imposing partial trade bans to rally domestic and Islamic support. Yet reality betrays the bl...
Post a Comment
Read more