Skip to main content

Prospects for peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan



by Martin Aslan

While war rages in the Middle East or in Ukraine over claims to ancestral lands, the South Caucasus remains a battleground of discord between Turkic and Armenian populations. This region has been crossed by serious ethnic and geopolitical events since the beginning of the 20th century. Today, Armenia is perceived as an obstacle to the free movement of Azeri populations towards Nakhichevan  exclave and more broadly between the Baku and Ankara axis. Negotiations to find a compromise are underway to stabilize relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

Origins of the conflict

At the end of the First World War, Armenia, very weakened, won three battles (Battles of Sardarapat, Bach Abaran and Karakilisa) against Türkiye, which recognized Armenian independence on June 4, 1918 with the Treaty of Batum. Armenian territory represented only 10,000 km² around Yerevan. By refusing the Treaty of Sèvres, Mustafa Kemal took up arms again against Armenia between September and December 1920. Mustafa Kemal's rapprochement with the Bolsheviks fixed the destiny of Armenia with the Treaty of Alexandropol, which ended the Armenian-Turkish war. The treaty made Armenia renounce its borders drawn by the Treaty of Sèvres in favor of the Bolsheviks. Armenia thus became a small republic of the USSR of less than 30,000 km². During this period, the provinces of Nakhichevan and Nagorno-Karabakh were incorporated into the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic. In September 1991, Armenia regained its independence after the collapse of the Soviet bloc. Nagorno-Karabakh and Nakhichevan became sources of tension with Azerbaijan. Although Nagorno-Karabakh is populated by 80% Armenians, Azerbaijan still claims this territory. During the last war in September 2023, Azerbaijan regained control of Nagorno-Karabakh, displacing around 70,000 Armenians. Another focal point of tension between the two countries now centers on the Nakhichevan region. This region is an exclave of Azerbaijan, which claims territorial continuity with its province.


Search for a Peace Solution

The pursuit of a peaceful solution to restore logistical links between Azerbaijan and its Nakhchivan province is widely acknowledged, in accordance with the ceasefire agreement of November 2020. However, the solutions proposed by Azerbaijan and Armenia are different in terms of their implementation.

The Zangazur corridor

Azerbaijan's solution is based on a corridor concept between the Zangilan region and Nakhchivan. This axis would allow unhindered movement to Nakhchivan without border guards. In the 2020 ceasefire agreements, it is clearly written that a transport connection must be established between the two regions, but the conditions of such a corridor are not specified. With the establishment of a kind of no man's land, Armenia's sovereignty would be compromised. In addition, this corridor would hinder the north-south axis of Armenian territory.

The Crossroads of Peace

The Crossroads of Peace is an expanded concept of the Zangazur corridor that respects Armenia’s sovereignty. The project provides for the connection of a range of logistics axes: railways, roads, electric cables, pipelines and gas pipelines between Armenia and Azerbaijan, but also between Armenia and Türkiye. In addition, the Crossroads of Peace provides for the development of north-south communication routes. Armenia is ready to implement the project while ensuring the security of connections as stipulated in Article 9 of the peace agreement. However, the project needs partners because its cost is high.

Peace seems close given the resumption of dialogue. The realization of the Armenian Crossroads of Peace project would boost the economy of the entire region and Armenia would become the logistics hub of the region. Will Türkiye and Azerbaijan grant such an opportunity to Armenia?

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Türkish influence in Asia: promoter of peace or supplier of weapons?

by Martin Aslan Türkiye’s relationship with Asia is a dynamic blend of cultural, religious, and economic ties shaping Türkiye’s foreign policy and regional influence. These multifaceted connections reveal how cultural and religious bonds intersect with Türkiye’s paradoxical roles as both a peacemaker and arms supplier and raises questions about its real commitment in fighting fitna (division) within the Muslim world. This ambiguous position also raises questions about the effectiveness of Ankara’s influence. Cultural and religious connections Asia has long held historical and cultural importance for Türkiye. The Turkish people originally migrated from regions around present-day Mongolia, a heritage President Erdogan often recalls. This historical memory partly explains Türkiye’s continuing interest in the Uyghur people of China. While Ankara occasionally criticizes Beijing’s repression of Uyghurs, it offers little tangible support. Türkiye’s cultural resonance extends to South Asia, pa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkish concerns mount as Iranian Kurdish Coalition rises

by Martin Aslan Both Erdoğan’s government and the Iranian regime perceive the Kurds as a threat. Estimates place their population between 7 and 15 million in Iran, Iranian Kurds—known as Rojhelati or Eastern Kurds—have faced ongoing discrimination, including restrictions on Kurdish language education, cultural expression, and political organizing. On February 22, 2026, five major Iranian Kurdish opposition parties formed the Coalition of Political Forces of Iranian Kurdistan (CPFIK) to coordinate efforts against the Islamic Republic. A sixth group, the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, joined on March 4. The coalition includes: Such political coordination among Iranian Kurdish movements is likely to be closely watched in Ankara, where Kurdish political and territorial developments beyond Türkiye’s borders are viewed through a national security lens. If Iranian Kurdish parties were to gain territorial control in Iranian Kurdistan, it would likely heighten concerns in Ankara. Türkiye ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Turkey's Cynical Game: Fueling Middle East Chaos While Preaching Peace

by Martin Aslan In the volatile geopolitics of March 2026, Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan remains the region's most destabilizing force—master of loud moral outrage and quiet strategic opportunism. The Azerbaijan-Israel axis perfectly exposes Ankara's hypocrisy. Azerbaijan supplies Israel with roughly 46% of its crude oil imports, flowing through Turkey's Ceyhan port via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. In return, Israeli drones and advanced weaponry helped Baku decisively defeat Armenia in recent conflicts. This partnership directly counters Iran, providing Israel intelligence access near Tehran's borders and stoking fears of unrest among Iran's large ethnic Azeri population. Turkey vociferously backs Azerbaijan as “one nation, two states,” supplying political cover and military aid. Simultaneously, Erdoğan unleashes blistering anti-Israel rhetoric—especially over Gaza—imposing partial trade bans to rally domestic and Islamic support. Yet reality betrays the bl...
Post a Comment
Read more