Skip to main content

What Turkiye Wants in Syria

by Martin Aslan



Turkiye conducted an airstrike against Kurds in Iraq and northern Syria in February. According to the Minister of Defense, the goal was to protect the Turkish people from extremists and terrorists. One can wonder whether this was the only reason or if there is more behind it.


Do Kurds Represent a Danger for Turkiye?

In part, but Turkiye likely instrumentalizes the confrontation with Kurds abroad to pursue other objectives. The Kurdish Workers’ Party (PKK) is banned in Turkiye and is also recognized as a terrorist group by the US and the EU. Still, the Turkish state and the PKK have clashed repeatedly since 1984 – and it would be incorrect to reduce this confrontation to terrorism. In Syria and Iraq, there are also Kurds who seek independence or autonomy. In Syria, the Kurds are represented by the YPG militia, which protects their territory. In Iraq, the autonomous region of Kurdistan has its own branch of the army: the Peshmerga. The official position of the YPG, as well as that of the Peshmerga, is completely clear: They are only responsible for the Kurds in their own country and are not concerned with what happens in Turkiye. The YPG regards itself as completely separate from the PKK and independent. They claim to protect only the rights and interests of Kurds in Syria and not those of Turkish Kurds.

As such, the argument that Kurds in foreign countries pose a danger to Turkiye seems entirely artificial. Yes, the PKK uses terrorist methods. Indeed, there are surely contacts between Kurds in Turkiye and those abroad. However, they remain two different groups with cultural differences, which result in different interests and expectations for the future.

If, in the future, the YPG and the PYD, the party affiliated with this militia, succeed in establishing a state with a high degree of autonomy, would this represent a danger for Turkiye? It is conceivable that such a state could support the PKK to some extent. However, it is more likely that a Kurdish state in Syria would seek good relations with its powerful Turkish neighbor, as the Kurdish autonomous region in Iraq already does. There is no reason why a Kurdish region in Syria would be different from the Kurdish region in Iraq and not have good relations with Turkiye.


Does Turkiye Have Other Objectives in Syria?

Yes, definitely. One could argue that the Kurds are merely a pretext for Turkiye to act militarily in the region. With the operation “Source of Peace,” Turkiye established a so-called “safe zone” on Syrian territory. This refers to a 30 km-wide strip of land along the Turkish border, controlled by Turkiye. This zone is intended for the forced resettlement of millions of Syrian immigrants. Turkiye massively infringes on the rights of refugees, and there are even numerous reports of torture.

The actual issue is political: Erdogan needs a scapegoat and has chosen the Kurds for this role. His economic policies have significantly harmed Turkiye, and his party has lost popularity. A simple solution is to blame migrants, portraying them as responsible for the high unemployment rate. The operation in Syria presents an opportunity for Erdogan to demonstrate that he is fighting for his people—against terrorists and against migrants.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relations between Türkiye and Latin America

by Martin Aslan Türkiye has established a real presence in regions such as Africa, especially in Libya and Somalia, as well as in Central Asia. Yet, one part of the world remains relatively under the radar in Turkish foreign policy: Latin America. Despite the geographical distance, it seems Ankara has been quietly working to expand its defense footprint in the region. Interestingly, the roots of Türkiye’s connection to Latin America stretch back to the 19th century, when immigrants from the Ottoman Empire, mostly Arabs, settled in South America. Locals called them "Los Turcos" (The Turks), a nickname that still stucks despite their actual ethnic origins. High-level visits and diplomatic expansion Türkiye launched an “Action Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean” in 1998. It was revised in 2006, when Türkiye declared that year as the “Year of Latin America and the Caribbean”. The plan served as a formal roadmap for engaging more seriously in the region. The first Turkish pr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Beyond Diplomacy: Türkiye’s Economic Footprint in Africa

by Martin Aslan Over the past two decades, Türkiye has undergone a significant transformation in its foreign policy, with the African continent emerging as a key strategic focus. Driven by a mix of economic ambition, diplomatic outreach, and geopolitical recalibration, Türkiye has steadily expanded its presence across Africa. This shift, which accelerated after Reçep Tayyip Erdoğan came to power in 2003, is reflected in the rapid increase in Turkish embassies, investment flows, and trade partnerships on the continent. While officials emphasize a “win-win” model of cooperation, critics argue that Türkiye’s engagement is guided more by resource acquisition and market access than by mutual development goals. Let’s not forget that Africa is a continent rich in natural resources, while Türkiye has very few (see the article “Africa, a continent with growing appeal”: https://turkishpulse.blogspot.com/2023/10/africa-continent-with-growing-appeal.html). This article examines the development of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Central Asia’s Cyprus Shift: Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan Defy Türkiye’s Stance

By Derya Vogel Why would Central Asian nations—key members of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS)—publicly challenge a Turkish-backed entity in the Mediterranean? At the EU–Central Asia Summit in Samarkand on April 3–4, 2025, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan made a surprising move: they endorsed UN Security Council Resolutions 541 and 550, which reject the legitimacy of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), a breakaway state recognized only by Türkiye. These resolutions reaffirm the Republic of Cyprus as the island’s sole legal government and call on all UN members not to recognize the TRNC or support its consolidation. To understand this shift, we must look back to 1974, when Cyprus was divided following a coup by Greek Cypriot nationalists aiming for unification with Greece. Türkiye responded by intervening militarily, leading to the island’s partition. The TRNC declared independence in 1983, but has remained diplomatically isolated. Türkiye, however, has consis...
Post a Comment
Read more