Skip to main content

The contradictions of Turkish international relations

 by Martin Aslan

On the international stage, Türkiye stands out as a unique country due to its political paradoxes. It is a NATO member, yet it purchases weapons from Russia. It is the only country in the world able to apply for membership of the European Union (EU) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) at the same time, the latter being an institution created by China. It does so while asserting its commitment to defending Turkish peoples, including the persecuted Uighurs in China. Above all, Türkiye achieves a tour de force by sheltering Hamas while getting closer to Israel, thus reaching the height of contradictions. What do these contradictions mean? On what policy are they based? Do they really serve Türkiye's interests?


Türkiye and NATO

Ankara joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1952 in the context of the Cold War. Indeed, the gateway from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean through the straits of the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles put Türkiye in a vulnerable position with respect to the Soviet Union. Türkiye was potentially exposed to an attempt by the USSR to annex these straits. By joining NATO, Türkiye's security was thus guaranteed. However, at the same time, Ankara became a partner of Greece. This situation was supposed to ease relations between the two countries. However, the Cyprus crisis in 1974 led to a brake of all relations between the two countries. Thereafter, the disagreements between Greece and Türkiye have continued to grow over the years but have never led to an open conflict. 


On October 22, 1951 in London, signing of the accession of Greece and Türkiye to NATO

Türkiye's decision to acquire the Russian ground-air defence system is another point of tension with other NATO countries. With Türkiye stubbornly sticking to this choice, the United States has excluded it from the F35 program to replace its aging F16 fleet. Recep Tayip Erdoğan's defiant stance toward NATO places Türkiye in an ambiguous position in its relations with Russia. This ambiguity is now exacerbated with the conflict in Ukraine. Indeed, Ankara is opposed to Moscow, which is at the origin of the conflict, while defending its interests which it has developed with the Kremlin. This attitude results in paradoxes, such as the sale of arms to Ukraine, while financing the war led by Russia, via rapidly increasing imports.


Relations between Türkiye and Russia

The relations between Türkiye and Russia have long been contentious. The two countries confronted each other fourteen times during the Ottoman period. These relations have remained complex and sometimes contradictory. Opposed from a political point of view but linked by commercial projects, the two countries maintain an opportunistic relationship. 

Over the past decade, events have shown that Türkiye is opposed to Russia on the issues of Ukraine, Syria, Libya and Azerbaijan. The situation in Syria had even prompted Türkiye to shoot down a Russian fighter plane suspected of crossing the Syrian-Turkish border. This difference was swept aside after a message of support from Vladimir Putin to the Turkish president after the July 2016 coup attempt. 

Despite these differences, Türkiye and Russia have signed several major contracts. These include the construction of a nuclear power plant in Akkuyou (http://www.akkunpp.com/index.php?lang=en), the construction of the Turkstream gas pipeline, the purchase of the S400 ground-to-air defense system and the order for 50 million doses of the Russian vaccine Sputnik V. Regardless of any event that directly or indirectly opposes the two nations, they undertake large-scale programs.

20 September 2022, Samarkand, Uzbekistan, Putin and Erdoğan walk arm in arm 


This situation is paradoxical because the realization of these projects establishes a form of dependence of Türkiye on Russia and will inevitably lead to compromises. The Western countries are not happy with this situation, so Türkiye is turning to Asia and is seeking to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.


Türkiye and the SCO

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization was established in 2001 with Russia, China and four former Soviet republics in Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. In 2016, the organization expanded to include India and Pakistan. In 2021, it was Iran's turn to join the alliance. 

Originally, the SCO was created for regional economic and security reasons. Today, China and Russia have used this organization as a flagship of their partnership and a vector of opposition to the presence of the United States in Asia. Within the SCO, Türkiye has the status of a discussion partner. 

The 22nd summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization was held on September 15 and 16 in Samarkand, Uzbekistan. In addition to the alliance's member states, two guests were particularly expected: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and his Azerbaijani counterpart, Ilham Aliyev. Asked by media outlets after the summit, the Turkish president said that Türkiye is targeting SCO membership. 

Such a prospect would be a first for a NATO member country. The argument for such a decision is that Asia was the birthplace of the Turkmen people. Being a cumbersome member in NATO and only difficult partner for integration into the European Union, Türkiye will undoubtedly have to be more conciliant towards its new partners.



Erdoğan is presented with a "Great Turan" card by his coalition partner, the leader of the ultra-nationalist MHP party, Devlet Bahçeli. This far-right party linked to the Grey Wolves keeps reiterating references to Türkiye's Asian origins.


Türkiye as a defender of the Muslim people

Türkiye's need for influence drives Ankara's policy. It tries to establish itself as a central defender of oppressed Muslim populations. The Tatar community is a Turkic Muslim people living under the oppression of Russia in Crimea. The Tatar people represent 20% of the population of the peninsula. However, 80% of this population is mobilized by Russia to fight in Ukraine. This situation pushes this community to flee their land to Türkiye as it was already the case in 2014 during the annexation of Crimea by Russia. However, Türkiye does not want to become a rear base for the Tatar protest. 

The Turkish Muslim international of which Recep Tayip Erdoğan dreams remains subject to Türkiye's national interests. As with the Uyghurs (also Muslim Turks) and China, Türkiye does not want to get into troubles with a major power. Beijing has repeatedly urged Ankara not to meddle in China's Uyghur problems. 

The Palestinian issue, on the other hand, is a high-profile issue for Türkiye. Indeed, Türkiye supports the efforts of the State of Palestine to be recognized as a state in international forums. Through the Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency (TIKA) and the NGO Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH), Türkiye supports Palestine in the face of Israeli actions. 

Paradoxically, this has not prevented Ankara from re-establishing its diplomatic ties with Jerusalem after a 10-year quarrel exacerbated by the Mavi Marmara affair (https://www.bbc.com/news/10203726). In the midst of an economic and energy crisis, in a context of war in Ukraine, Türkiye is flirting with a state with which it is opposed in any case. The supposed objective of this rapprochement is energy cooperation, even if this hypothesis has little chance of succeeding. On the other hand, Türkiye needs investments and thanks to a normalization of relations, Ankara can be optimistic about economic benefits. 


Conclusion

Türkiye's international relations are ambivalent and based on one-sided interests. Support for Turkish minorities and the Muslim people is only a facade given Recep Tayip Erdoğan's relations with certain countries. The foreign policy that Ankara is pursuing is a very risky bet for the future of modern Türkiye on the eve of its centenary. Türkiye has multiple relationships without having any real friends or allies. 

Erdoğan is trying to restore Turkish pride on the centenary of the Republic, but does his policy really achieve this goal? Rather, it tends to divide and destabilize. It gives the image of an unstable, confused, indecisive and unreliable nation. Rather, it is a nation that is still searching for itself.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Relations between Türkiye and Latin America

by Martin Aslan Türkiye has established a real presence in regions such as Africa, especially in Libya and Somalia, as well as in Central Asia. Yet, one part of the world remains relatively under the radar in Turkish foreign policy: Latin America. Despite the geographical distance, it seems Ankara has been quietly working to expand its defense footprint in the region. Interestingly, the roots of Türkiye’s connection to Latin America stretch back to the 19th century, when immigrants from the Ottoman Empire, mostly Arabs, settled in South America. Locals called them "Los Turcos" (The Turks), a nickname that still stucks despite their actual ethnic origins. High-level visits and diplomatic expansion Türkiye launched an “Action Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean” in 1998. It was revised in 2006, when Türkiye declared that year as the “Year of Latin America and the Caribbean”. The plan served as a formal roadmap for engaging more seriously in the region. The first Turkish pr...

Beyond Diplomacy: Türkiye’s Economic Footprint in Africa

by Martin Aslan Over the past two decades, Türkiye has undergone a significant transformation in its foreign policy, with the African continent emerging as a key strategic focus. Driven by a mix of economic ambition, diplomatic outreach, and geopolitical recalibration, Türkiye has steadily expanded its presence across Africa. This shift, which accelerated after Reçep Tayyip Erdoğan came to power in 2003, is reflected in the rapid increase in Turkish embassies, investment flows, and trade partnerships on the continent. While officials emphasize a “win-win” model of cooperation, critics argue that Türkiye’s engagement is guided more by resource acquisition and market access than by mutual development goals. Let’s not forget that Africa is a continent rich in natural resources, while Türkiye has very few (see the article “Africa, a continent with growing appeal”: https://turkishpulse.blogspot.com/2023/10/africa-continent-with-growing-appeal.html). This article examines the development of ...

Central Asia’s Cyprus Shift: Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan Defy Türkiye’s Stance

By Derya Vogel Why would Central Asian nations—key members of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS)—publicly challenge a Turkish-backed entity in the Mediterranean? At the EU–Central Asia Summit in Samarkand on April 3–4, 2025, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan made a surprising move: they endorsed UN Security Council Resolutions 541 and 550, which reject the legitimacy of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), a breakaway state recognized only by Türkiye. These resolutions reaffirm the Republic of Cyprus as the island’s sole legal government and call on all UN members not to recognize the TRNC or support its consolidation. To understand this shift, we must look back to 1974, when Cyprus was divided following a coup by Greek Cypriot nationalists aiming for unification with Greece. Türkiye responded by intervening militarily, leading to the island’s partition. The TRNC declared independence in 1983, but has remained diplomatically isolated. Türkiye, however, has consis...